Comments for Radio @ Firehouse.com

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Lilli Putian

Lilli Putian — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:57:41 +0000

What are the Risks of Naphthalene and Vinyl Acetate?

NAPHTHALENE

On Naphthalene from the Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR:

“Exposure to naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, or 2-methylnaphthalene happens mostly from breathing air contaminated from the burning of wood, tobacco, or fossil fuels, industrial discharges, or moth repellents. Exposure to large amounts of naphthalene may damage or destroy some of your red blood cells. Naphthalene has caused cancer in animals. Naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene have been found in at least 687, 36, and 412, respectively, of the 1,662 National Priority List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).”

(Also Google Naphthalene and learn more: It’s a carcinogen.)

VINYL ACETATE

Vinyl acetate causes “irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs of laboratory animals.” You can read this at

And what I found interesting is as follows: “There is no evidence that vinyl acetate causes cancer in humans. Vinyl acetate caused tumors in the noses of rats that breathed 600 ppm for 2 years. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined that vinyl acetate is possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).”
Notice how in the same paragraph, “there is no evidence that vinyl acetate causes cancer,” and yet the IARC determined it is “possibly carcinogenic.”

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by kato

kato — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:35:37 +0000

i am going to have these lab tested soon and compared to the regular ones… it doesnt save many lives at all, wonder why they would spend millions to make them safer for only hundreds of lives?? well if there so concerned with public health, why dont they regulate the mass poisons being put in there?? the truth is, they have just made them deadlier. they don’t care about health.. isn’t that obvious?? PURE TOBACCO DOES NOT CAUSE CANCER. smoking chemicals DOES. Im almost certain that these “safe” cigerettes will cause cancer at a quicker rate… what will you say, These new cigerettes gave me cancer faster?? everyone will laugh at you.. because they are known to cause cancer anyway..
Based on taxes, the government makes MUCH MORE money then the tobacco companies.. so who really owns them?? what happens when the government takes over industries?? Look at the banks.. they now have that sector controlled.. bail out the companies (basicly take them over) and to hell with the people who really need help. MORE and more people are loosing there houses after the “bank bail out” scam.. They have done this with cigerettes a long time ago.. Now, try growing your own tobacco.. you will be raided by the ATF and put in jail. Come on now, they even have a tobacco task force.. (atf) Time to move to a private island next door to the bast*rds that control this s*it. by the way, i am NOT a republican or a democrat.. evil is evil, no sides..

Comment on 2009 Fire/EMS Safety Week: USFA Roundtable on Firefighter Safety by Terry Farley

Terry Farley — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:29:01 +0000

Great work to all concerned, a lot to learn and work on, even for us down here in Sydney, Australia.

Chief Superintendent Terry Farley
Area Commander Metropolitan Operations
NSW Fire Brigades

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Dodd Apao

Dodd Apao — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:37:36 +0000

What are your recommendations for responding to fires involving photovoltaic systems? From the PV panels to the disconnect, as long as there is light,we are dealing with a live wire that is capable of putting out up to 600 volts. Thank you for your assistance.

Comment on 2009 Fire/EMS Safety Week: USFA Roundtable on Firefighter Safety by Mike

Mike — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:32:16 +0000

Great job gang I think we have a lot to learn on twitering live but it was fun, keep it up!

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Derek Day

Derek Day — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:56:03 +0000

How can we motivate some of the chiefs and departments that think firefighter safety and firefighter survival is a waste of time?

How do we get them out of the mindset of the old comments “we have done it this way for years or nothing like that will ahppen here?

Do you think NFPA 1407 once it is final will help some of these departments?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Lenora Ellison

Lenora Ellison — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:38:59 +0000

Firefighters responding to a call in their POV without using their seat belts.
Use of seat belts needs to be enforced constantly.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Michael Jones

Michael Jones — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:29:59 +0000

I believe if we are going to reduce ff lodds. We need to have mandatory physicals for every member who responds to emergency calls. Have the cost be paid for by reduced insurance costs, a rebate at the end of every year from your insurance company. FFs are classified into 4 different categories A–interior no air pack restrictions B- exterior only short term air pack use C- equipment operators/ fire police D- not approved for ff activities. I believe until all ff take physicals that we will continue to have a high number of ff every year dying of heart related issues. Staffing is another issue that faces every fd. We have tried using signs going door to door and it’s the same few doing it all. We are not getting any new volunteers.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by George Dare

George Dare — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:29:34 +0000

Hello, My name is George Dare a high-end original music producer. One such song is the Fire Safety song and radio ad campaign “Stop, Drop & Roll” which is taught to over 8 million students and Sr. Citizens every year - many FireFighter Clowns use the song in their presentations.

I am offering this campaign free of charge, just e-mail me your request and mailing address and the CD will be sent - no postage or handling charges either.

If you would like to listen to some of my work including “Stop, Drop & Roll” please feel free to visit my website http://www.GeorgeDare.com

Another song that is FireFighter related is “Proud To Be By Your Side” which has come to be known as the Firefighter’s theme. I was comissioned to create and present this song at the IAFF convention in Las Vegas during the 1980s.

Complete with 120-piece live orchestra, this song is used at Rookie Graduations; Award Banquets; Retirement Parties and for “Last Call.”

Musically,
George Dare
702-275-2800
Greater Las Vegas, NV area

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Chuck Smevy

Chuck Smevy — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:27:23 +0000

Most would agree that the number one killer of fire fighters is heart attacks. Those that have studied this issue overwhelming agree that two items can make the biggest reduction: they are Medical Physicals and Physical Fitness Programs.
In one of my classes I teach at the University of Florida in Fire & Emergency Services, I ask the student to do an analysis of their department’s compliance with NFPA 1500. They are instructed to do this with the Safety Officer. In all but a few departments, most do not have a physical fitness program that creditable.
By creditable, I mean that is mandatory. Any program that is not mandatory will have a high percentage of non-participates. It is my antidotal observation that there is substantial resistance from both individuals (typically, these are the individuals who need it the most.) as well as fire/rescue organizations. There are many winners when there is a mandatory physical fitness program such as;
• the individual–decreased chance of heart attack and better chance to survive one,
• the customer-the efforts of the team are always dictated by the weakest link,
• the team members-it is always SAFER to work with team members who are physical fit,
• the department-the public and elected officials derive their impression by what they see, and
• the city/county-reduced workmen’s compensation claims, sick leave and medical insurance.

How can we increase the fitness of fire fighters to reduce heart attacks?

Respectfully submitted:

Chuck Smeby, Coordinator & Lecturer
Fire & Emergency Services Program
University of Florida

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Paul Love

Paul Love — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:20:21 +0000

With the extensive amount of information now be required by Fire Departments around the nation, and this information being “Mandatory” pursuant to the NFRIS, it would seem that the departments that are not entering this information, information that could save others lives, be somehow fined or dissolved in order to make way for professionals that strive to follow the rules and regulations. We need all the necessary information from everyone in order to provide us all a safer work environment. Can that be done?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Charles Riddle

Charles Riddle — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:16:17 +0000

Vice President Biden has been in newspapers,magazines,and all types of press releases and he states that he and President Obama will help fund fire departments and help us gain personnel,more stations and help us in daily operating expenses. I was wondering when this funding will show up and how will it effect us? We apply for grants all we can but we need more funding!Thanks!

Sincerely,

Charles Riddle
St. Pauls Fire District
6488 Hwy 162 Hollywood SC
843-889-9414

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Carl D. Avery

Carl D. Avery — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:25:37 +0000

IF Firefighter Safety is such an issue, and I believe it is, why can’t we get “the Sweet Sixteen” National Fallen Firefighter Foundation Live Safety Initaitives Published in our Standard Firefighting text books from Delmar, IFSTA, Bartlet & James etc. To the best of my knowledge none of these text share this listing. IF it is important enough to a safety summit about ISN’T it important enough to incorporate into our standard text books?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Nelson Vazquez

Nelson Vazquez — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:09:15 +0000

What education is out there that sheds a spotlight on the differences between law enforcement/fire dept and private investigator’s responses to fire scenes? Specifically, my concern is on spoliation issues that hamper insurance company origin and cause determinations. Thank you for your thoughts.

Nelson Vazquez
SIU Director - Liberty Mutual Personal Lines
Home Office, Boston

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Jim Bonner

Jim Bonner — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:39:41 +0000

If I may suggest, that training academy directors at the state, regional, metro city and small city, be invited to regional meetings with the leaders of the NFFF. Buy-in by training academy directors and fire chiefs in every size municipalty will promote the life safety initiatives.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Randall W. Hanifen

Randall W. Hanifen — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:37:44 +0000

How can suburban (and redeveloping urban) departments teach safety practices on the fireground when the buildings are constructed of new materials that have not failed and provided an example of “what not to do”?, I think NIST is on to how we should examine this issue, but are firefighters ready for this new and highly scientific information? Should we push this more in our safety programs?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Michael Robitaille

Michael Robitaille — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:33:38 +0000

Firefighter safety is a topic that is very broad and genral in nature. The primary causes have been identified as preventable and predicatable. Nearly 50% of firefighter deaths occur from coronary related deaths. Has the NFA considered expanding their programs to include a six day program on Health and Fitness. I have attended many of their programs and Fitness and Wellness are only just a portion or chapter of many programs. how about a whole class dedicated to this topic?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Jack Hamilton

Jack Hamilton — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:26:56 +0000

We all know the inherent risks associated with this profession, as safe as we can make it, and still be able to provide a viable service to the public, it dangerous. We are safer on the fire ground than we have ever been. We are better at knowing where to draw the line between acceptable risk and non-acceptable risk. We all know the old adage “risk a lot to save a lot, risk a little to save a little”, but in today’s fire service it seems to have lost some of it’s meaning. We are losing far to many of our people before we even get to that point. Most fire protection agencies today provide some sort of first response EMS, as it turns out more of our brothers and sisters are made sick or injured, or even killed in this capacity than on the fire ground. Generally during the response itself. Fire apparatus and EMS vehicles are seldom safety tested for rollover, or crash survivability for the occupants. Isn’t it about time we took a look at this?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Gary Piekarczyk

Gary Piekarczyk — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:21:28 +0000

It comes back to training as I have always heard when things go right or wrong. Could National best basic practices work or help keep us safer? Thanks!

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Todd LeDuc, Broward County (FLA) Deputy Chief of Department

Todd LeDuc, Broward County (FLA) Deputy Chief of Department — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:21:22 +0000

With nearly one out of every two fighter line of duty deaths caused by cornary artery disease, what is our profession doing to actively address this? Specifically, a number of risk factors are not only identifiable but preventable or at least modifiable. Aggressive identification of pre-metabolic syndrome and factors such as elevated blood sugars and lipids as well as hypertension and BMI management are all factors that should be monitored within the fire service and aimed at identifying those at greatest risk prior continuing the cycle of coronary artery disease LODD.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Robert McMahon

Robert McMahon — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:17:01 +0000

Perhaps more of a comment than a question. However, after 40 years in the Fire Service both as a Career and Voluntter I think we do a disservice to “fallen fighters” when we include as LOD Deaths those responding to calls in private vehicles who crash killing themselves and sometimes others. Some of younger members view these poor souls as heroes as they died in the line of duty. Lets be courageous enough to say that we cannot equate these deaths with those who lose their lives under more unpreventable circumstances.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Larry Ward

Larry Ward — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:09:31 +0000

We typically run with mutual aid that does not share the same “safety values” that we teach and live by. While their officers may agree with our thinking, it often does not trickle down to the members actually on the fireground. How can we, on a “working fire” demonstrate to these members that we mean business? We have often pulled our members back in what we consider to be a “dangerous situation” and relayed this to the Incident Commands. We have also threatened to send companies home for free lancing and safe acts, but time and time again the same scenario keeps showing its ugly head. Many times when we are under another incident command. I agree with Vance Richardson, how can we dicipline the company or member espicially as we are all volunteers?

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Patrick J Kenny

Patrick J Kenny — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:38:57 +0000

I believe one area that is the “ugly stepchild” hidden in the firefighter health and safety closet is the whole subject of mental health. What can we do about the fact we are losing firefighters, both through leaving the service or worse in the form of suicides, due to untreated and/or undiagnosed mental health conditions? This is not limited to event triggered incidents like Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome but also triggered by day to day issues like divorce, financial hardships etc. This is an area we must hit head on or risk losing more amd more of our firefighters annually to mental health issues.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Tim Merinar

Tim Merinar — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:05:45 +0000

What do you see as the single biggest obstacle to improving fire fighter safety and health

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Andrew Reid

Andrew Reid — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:20:25 +0000

Please be aware that I can be contacted with any information any professional known fire safety projects related to local LGBT communities via my e-mail address ‘ reidandrew@live.co.uk. Thank you.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Jimmy Taylor

Jimmy Taylor — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:17:22 +0000

An improper size-up, or worst yet, no size-up is a major contributing factor to alot of LODD’s. What would you think about adding a fourth bechmark of “Size-up Complete” to MINS so everyone on the fireground would know that initial tactics were based off of a complete size-up.

Thanks,
Jimmy Taylor
Cobb County Fire & Emergency Services (Ga.)

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Andrew Reid

Andrew Reid — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:16:50 +0000

Hi I am intrested in learning about any ‘Community fire saftey’projects that related to localised LGBT communities. Currentley I am not aware of any fire safety information that is specifically designed and applied to this section of the community. And would like to learn more. please e-mail me if you can provide advice or infomation. Many thanks.

Comment on Safety Week Roundtables - June 14 to June 20 by Vance Richardson III

Vance Richardson III — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:10:54 +0000

With all of the national efforts being made to improve the safety of fire departments, why don’t I read about firefighters being suspended or fired from departments for being unsafe? We all know it’s happening, but what’s happening about this problem?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Johnny5

Johnny5 — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:32:06 +0000

It’s entirely up to the consumer to be responsible with products they choose to use. If someones burns their house down, well hey, thats their fucking problem. I am sick of the government trying to babysit America.

Comment on Through The Smoke: Firefighter Trapped - A Mayday and a LODD by christon

christon — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:54:42 +0000

Thanks for the information and learning experience.

God Blees your work

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Chris C

Chris C — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:39:33 +0000

Goi to this website to stop these nasty, disguisting cigerettes.Put marlboro back in the saddle, and go to where the real flavor is. The old, not the new marlboro country.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-fire-safe-cigarette-laws

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Smiley

Smiley — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:02:38 +0000

I am extremely aggravated about these new fire safe cigarettes. They taste worse than the stale cigarettes I was smoking while I was deployed to Iraq over this last year. I learned about them as soon as one of my buddies showed me the little FSC printed on the side of of the box next to the UPC. I find it bullshit that they had to destroy the taste of cigarettes and add extra chemicals to them. I am appalled by this new idea that some smartass in Washington though of. I am sorry but I didn’t spend a year overseas to come back and be disgusted by my cigarettes and also to feel sick due to the new chemicals added to them.

Comment on Training & Tactics Talk: Training Today’s Fire Service by Josh

Josh — Tue, 26 May 2009 23:06:13 +0000

Thank you for your effort in putting this discussion togethar. This is a very important topic, I enjoyed listening to your views and ideas on how to improve training! I recommend this to all Fire personnel!

Comment on A Chat With Chief Dave Paulison, New FEMA Director… And Dennis Smith - ‘Report from Engine Company 82′ by Stickers Honda

Stickers Honda — Sat, 23 May 2009 09:40:48 +0000

One of my friends also just started as firefighter! Bless all firefighters

Comment on Near-Miss Listen & Learn: Firefighter Cancer by Thomas M. Bendricks

Thomas M. Bendricks — Sat, 16 May 2009 02:18:13 +0000

Thank you to both of you. This podcast speaks the truth to the fire service and we have plenty to learn still. A cancer survivor myself, we need to know how important testing is. Both of you deserve a great ‘thank you’.

Comment on The Leader’s Toolbox: When You See the Chief’s Son in a Suggestive Photo by Thomas S.

Thomas S. — Sat, 16 May 2009 00:12:26 +0000

Fire Chief Gasaway,

I recently attended the 2009 WV Public Safety Expo which was held at the Charleston Civic Center, Charleston Wv, and I had the great privelage to set in on your opening speech and also maintaining your situation awareness under stress class. After attending both classes I realized what great information I had learned and shared it with my fellow firefighters. I personally would like to thank you for sharing your outstanding advice and look forward to reading articles and future speeches you present. May god bless you, your family, and your department

Thomas S.
East Bank Vol. Fire Dept.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by *

Fri, 08 May 2009 15:33:35 +0000

James M. Shannon, one day you will have to answer to God.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by America will win

America will win — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:30:07 +0000

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-fire-safe-cigarette-laws

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by James M. Shannon's equivelent of Auschwitz Gas-Ovens; NFPA - explain please:

James M. Shannon's equivelent of Auschwitz Gas-Ovens; NFPA - explain please: — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:28:33 +0000

http://www.newscientist.com/commenting/browse?id=dn3192

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by America will win

America will win — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:21:55 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mTXZVCOM0Y

Comment on 2009 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program - Part 1 by Pete Fister

Pete Fister — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:44:30 +0000

Can a Municipality owned EMS provider that is not FD run apply for AFG monies?

Comment on 2009 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program - Part 1 by Shane Eaton

Shane Eaton — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:43:07 +0000

Yes I would believe that you are eligible. I would suggest a regional grant application since you have five individual departments.

Comment on 2009 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program - Part 1 by roger williams

roger williams — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:56:46 +0000

I am vice chairman of our county fire service board. We collect a fire fee and use the collected funds to pay the expenses of 5 individual volunteer fire companies. Is our fire service board eligible to request funds for equipment, engines, turnout gear, etc.?

Comment on Leadership on the Line: Does it Take a Doctor to Lead the Fire Service? by Steve Thompson

Steve Thompson — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:58:14 +0000

Dr. Clark,

I just listened to the Podcast of the “Leadership on the Line: Does it Take a Doctor to Lead the Fire Service?”. It has been nearly two years since the orginal broadcast, has there been some advances in the doctorate level studies in the fire service? I see that there are some in emergency services but have any fire service specific programs been developed? Also is there a central database or key contact that is gathering important research topics for the fire service as a whole? Very interesting topic!

Thanks,

Steve

Comment on Fire Marshal’s Corner: Battling the Residential Sprinkler Opponents at the Local Level by Ken Farmer

Ken Farmer — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:32:44 +0000

Ed and Company:
Great stuff! The fire service needs to understand that there is a positive side to politics regarding residential sprinklers.

Comment on The Leader’s Toolbox: Can’t Get Promoted & The Micro-Managing Chief by Rich Gasaway

Rich Gasaway — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:50:17 +0000

Matt,

First, CONGRATULATIONS on your promotion, an outstanding accomplishment and a big responsibility. I encourage you to go back in the Leader’s Toolbox archives and download the podcasts and listen to them. There’s lots of potential land mines out there waiting to detail you. Pre-load your success.

It has been my observation that the single most important factor that contributes to someone’s success (or lack of) is attitude. Skills can be taught, but attitude comes from within a person and is 100% under that person’s control. Shame on the person who lets someone else control their attitude.

Remember… your attitude will affect your altitude!

Best of success to you, Matt!

Rich

Comment on VCOS Radio: The Economy and the Stimulus Package by Payday Loans

Payday Loans — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:38:30 +0000

Thanks for posting this pod cast I really enjoyed listebing to it.

Comment on The Leader’s Toolbox: Can’t Get Promoted & The Micro-Managing Chief by Matt Lyons

Matt Lyons — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:29:15 +0000

Regarding the Angry Perpetual Fireman:

I agree with the 4 points you said Chief. The BIGGEST on that hit me was that attitude. I was siding with him when he was doing his woe-is-me speech, but when he mentioned the EMS Resentment, I cringed. EMS is where the US fire service is going. Fire is going to the wayside unfortunately. I’m a newly promoted young Lieutenant and I can understand this concept. Another thing you need to do is be Dynamic. You have to change with the times and not be “old school” If you can do this, your career potential is limitless. Great program Chief, thanks for the insight!

-Newbie Lieutenant and Young Gun
Dayton area Ohio.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Cheryl Harris

Cheryl Harris — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:52:27 +0000

Safe cigarette? IT’S A JOKE.
(Let us see the survey on how many FIRES and
BURN INJURIES the SAFER cigarette causes!)

It is UNSAFER than originals.
Lit end falls off,constantly. REAL SAFE,HUH?
(Play hide and seek to find it, see if it is
going to catch something on fire)
Keep relighting, paper lights up in OPEN FLAME, right IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.
Burns in ashtray, but goes out when smoking it.
TASTE = Horrible disgusting after taste
PRICING = higher than before

The people who came up with this GRAND IDEA, apparently had no knowledge of how dangerous their
NEW IMPROVED PRODUCT would be. Let’s see how long it takes for them to own up to this endangering MISTAKE.
SOLUTION : ROLL YOUR OWN, LIKE MY GRAMPA USED TO DO !

Comment on Campus Firewatch Radio: Fire Retardants and Firefighter Safety by Sam

Sam — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:12:32 +0000

One more area where fire retardants are used liberally is in industrial cables, especially those used in hazardous areas. These cables re normally specified to be of FRLS PVC (FRLS standing for Fire Retardant Low Smoke). The low smoke is really useful while fighting fires, but I do not know what kind of gases are released, if any. Probably the gases have more to do with the burning of the PVC rather than just the fire retardant.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Julie Syre

Julie Syre — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:26:37 +0000

One more thing; with your forced - and snuck upon the public “Fire-Safe” cigarettes being so very much more of a fire hazard (lit ends regularly falling off, the bursting into flames upon being re-lit, etc.) than the former regular cigarettes, will you please explain yourself as a Fire-Prevention organization, on this. Please.

Giving you the bennifit of the doubt that you are not absolute fools and (or) cold blooded killers with an utterly amazing amount of blood on your hands, please just simply explain.
Again, please just tell the truth.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Julie Syre

Julie Syre — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:43:41 +0000

Mr. James M. Shannon and everyone behind this *thing* with the NFPA,

Will our personnel in the Army, Navy and Marines, and our new President, be exempt from being swiftly, severely hurt and/or exterminated by this if they don’t quit smoking, or will they get a break until they are no longer in our needed, important positions, or, how, exactly, does that work ?…
Will you, soon, and completely - just tell the truth.

Also, do the millions and millions of people in the states where this is coming, but hasn’t gotten there yet, get a warning and hopefully a vote, or, must they get the surprise attack, like the millions and millions of suffering in already established FSC states?
Please, tell the truth.

Comment on The Apparatus Architects: Vehicle Maintenance & The Boston Report by Erik Pettaway

Erik Pettaway — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:01:51 +0000

Good job fellas. Having said that there are a few things I’d like to add not so much to counter the report but to point out somethings I feel were omitted.
1) The city fired the mechanics over 20 year ago.
2) “close to retirement” - Only within the last 2 years did the Commissioner transfer a chief officer to maintenance. In my 2 decades on, there never was a chief assigned there.
3) record keeping- Only recently have the firehouses recieved computers and many are limited in what you can or can’t do.We still hand deliver or fax most reports.
There are others but I feel in order to have great Fleet Maintenance, you need proper funding.Maybe that idea of regional spares is the way to go.
There are spares that are over 20 years old constantly in service. Unfortunately, we have come to accept this and try to do the best we can.

Comment on Through The Smoke: Firefighter Trapped - A Mayday and a LODD by women smokers

women smokers — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:30:48 +0000

Very good site, excellent content, I will recommend to my group of readers in college too, I will leave an input —- Women smokers By now, we are all aware that smoking is bad for you. Yet more and more women are taking up the habit, in part due to the media image presented of gorgeous women smoking cigarettes and presenting a glamourous image. What kind of effects does this have on women’s health, and what can we do about it?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Thad

Thad — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:56:37 +0000

http://www.topix.com/forum/business/tobacco/T2EIG851IPJGQ26DU

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Miserable and Angry

Miserable and Angry — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:29:54 +0000

I have been smoking for 40 years, and until the switch to FSC, I never had a cough or any problems with cigarettes: not so now. I also never had a fire, but the way the FSCs burn, it’s a challenge not to start one–and I do not mean while in bed (I do not smoke in bed); I mean everywhere else. THESE ARE NOT FIRE SAFE! THESE ARE FIRE HAZARDS in a way MUCH worse than the old cigarettes! They are also unacceptable for people to smoke, and whether anyone likes it or not, people WILL continue to smoke. And they will die a whole lot sooner because of FSCs.

It is unconscionable that no tests on the further impact to smokers’ health were conducted, as if smokers are simply expendable, as if all nonsmokers are perfect and risk-free to themselves and others in all they do, as if no nonsmoker has ever caused a fire.

Morever, some of us are grandfathered into this habit; I’ve been smoking since I was 14. I do not need strangers with well intended but totally irresponsible and dangerous agendas to change my lifestyle based on actions that neither I nor any smoker I know (and I know quite a few) have committed. FSCs represent a blind judgment of me, and a condemnation of me, by virtue of my simply smoking. These are charges I can’t even defend myself against.

How anyone involved with this FSC fiasco can sleep peacefully at night is beyond me. You have made people miserable and sick for nothing at all. WHY WAS THERE NOT SOME LESS INVASIVE EFFORT TO COUNTER FIRE PROBLEMS WITH CIGARETTES? Why not a public service campaign to discourage smoking when sleepy or to suggest safe methods of disposal? Why not large-print prominent fire warnings on the packages? There are MANY MANY ways to reach people without treating them like junkyard dogs.

Also, the absolutely SNEAKY way this change was carried out is an abomination in a land that is supposed to be open with information and free. Smokers need to rally. We really do. Myself, I had a chain-smoking grandfather who smoked from the age of 8 until he died in his 90s. He was happy. He caused no fires. Today, with FSC, he’d never reach his 60s.

Comment on Training & Tactics Talk: Examining Text Book Strategy & Tactics by Ryan

Ryan — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:58:03 +0000

Well, I am not a firefighter, but I enjoyed your site anyways. Guess it’s the little boy fantasy of being a fireman. Hey! Thanks to all you guys!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Donna

Donna — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:58:36 +0000

My husband and I have gotten migraine headaches, severe sudden onset coughing, choking phlegm and chest pains after smoking FSC. I received second degree burns on my breasts and burned the inside of my bra when the end fell off for no reason and went down my blouse. I contacted the Coalition and sent photos. I also took photos of an FSC that sat in my ashtray and burned to the ashtray grips without going out. I received a reply that according to product standards, there is a 25 percent fail rate allowed on them. If these jokers were making child safety seats they would be in prison. They are already dodging responsibility, as they are saying the tobacco companies have not changed their blends and there are no additives. Yet, on the Coalition blog, there is an article that is stating that these cigarettes are made from fire retardant paper and ADDITIVES. When they have the living crap sued out of them by a million sick and dying smokers, they will undoubtedly tell us all that FSC had nothing to do with it, and it is because we smoke in the first place. Evil, all of them.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Bonnie

Bonnie — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:26:10 +0000

I cannot believe what I am hearing/seeing on here…..my hubby and I are heavy smokers…..for the past month we have been so sick….sore throats- so sore one night I was nearly in tears….couldn’t sleep the pain was so bad….the congestion is horrid…I am hacking up so much more, blowing my nose all the time. We thought maybe we were constantly catching something from people like the flu,cold,strep…but, it does make sense now. My hubby tried telling me it was the smokes…and now, I believe him, with so many others having the same complaint. It’s like going thru slow withdrawl each day…..never getting my fix of nicotine,not getting the deep seize in my lungs I so badly crave, my congestion coming on as if my body is cleansing itself as if I had stopped smoking and then slipped again and again.No wonder there is such sore throat….you have to toke so hard on these worthless things and still get no satifaction. We have had enough. I am starting to think I will get more nicotine and such out of patches and the gum. I have tried to quit 4 times now, and gotta say, this time might be the magic time…cause my full flavored cigs. are like smoking ultra-lites! Like puffing air, giving me stomach upset. I am in my 30’s, been smoking 20 years..up to over 2 packs a day…and each time the cost of smokes goes up I say I am going to quit….but, this takes the cake. And in another month or 2 they are raisng the cost and tax again…….what? are the cig. manufacturers placing in nicotine patch stock now to convert over? They know this is going to be another thing that gets some to stop smoking….. Why doesn’t my voice count on this issue? I am the one paying for my smokes, smoking my smokes, gonna possibly die from it….why isn’t it my choice? When we were banned from public places like restaruants and such, we kindly moved it outside,some of us in Minn. freezing our tails off, they wanted more money from something allready putting smokers in lower living bracket….but, I gave my extra hard earned bucks…for what? A smoke that ain’t even a smoke anymore? We are slated to quit tommorrow……got the patches and gum….was suppose to be today…but, of course….these lousy cigs, make us crave even more than our usual…hubby is tired of driving to different towns trying to find places that have any non-FSC smokes left….we get hooked and the very companies we are loyal to don’t even fight to cut us some slack…truly, I want to stop smoking….and yet, quitting is so hard…I have failed each time….and being stuck in between now….quitting=huge hassle/withdrawl and so forth is intwined with being sick and craving if I fail and smoke anyway…..it’s crap….local city 13 miles away is having controversy over creating a new 3 million dollar liquor store…..the logic there is so beyond me anymore…..the city wants to create and run this…knowing drunk drivers kill gobs of people….and yet, that is ok..to back….knowing they will get more money from busting the drunk drivers…..we gave our government to much control and now we can’t get it back….

Comment on The Apparatus Architects: Cab Safety by The Apparatus Architects: Cab Safety

The Apparatus Architects: Cab Safety — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:58:33 +0000

[…] See the rest here: The Apparatus Architects: Cab Safety […]

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Paul

Paul — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 01:44:23 +0000

The use of “speed bump” is used as a straw man argument to distract from the use of chemicals added to the tobacco. The tobacco in the cigarette is dried out and will turn to powder when crushed and will smell strongly of moth balls. Also,recently this chemical has been added to some “roll your own” tobacco,more so with menthol. Note that real fresh tobacco should not turn to a dried out powder when crushed and should not have a chemical smell. And consider how the change was applied without warning or notice. The rich smoke expensive cigars without poison - check it out yourself.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Margaret

Margaret — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:33:02 +0000

Everyone knows that in America the only way you can effectively vote is with your dollars. They will continue to put these chemicals in your cigarettes banking on the fact that you will still buy them because you are hopelessly addicted to nicotine. As long as they are turning a high enough profit they will continue to do so. Your only recourse is to send your money and their tax dollars to the Native Americans making plain tobacco cigarettes, roll your own or if you have the will power quit. Have all your friends do this as well. When profits drop enough they will change them back. Politicians will listen only when it hurts their bottom line. Everyone knows they could care less about your health if it makes them money. Greed and ignorance could cause what is tantamount to a Holocaust unless this happens. These cigarettes are EXTREMELY Dangerous!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by ROBERT ZELLERS

ROBERT ZELLERS — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:37:40 +0000

I THINK WE ALL KNOW THIS IS TOTALLY ABSURD ALTERATION OF A PRODUCT THAT IS TOO HEAVILY TAXED.

Comment on Through The Smoke: The Charleston Fire…What’s Changed? - Part 1 by Arlo K. Sterner

Arlo K. Sterner — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:06 +0000

It is hard to believe Charleston F.D. and what happened there. Even little Departments in Vermont have lots of training and some how or other have decent gear. Like Charleston things could be better as our small towns constantly lack money mostly due to some Selectboard members who have personality conflicts with volunteers, equipments gets old and stays that way for some reason. I now have 55 years
of rural fire service, fortunately our training has
kept us free of many troubles. we do use imager’s,gas meters,have good SCBA and know how to use it with constant training.

Comment on The Apparatus Architects: Operating in Cold Weather by Ed Brouwer

Ed Brouwer — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:19:23 +0000

Just a word of thanks to Chief Billy. I re-listened to the Charleston Nine tapes and of course was moved by them.. However I wanted to let you know that I am doing what I can (in my circle of influence) to change the Canadian Fire Services Mayday Protocols. At this time we have no clear guidelines in place. But through our SOO HOT programs our department is bringing the message into an ever growing number of fire houses.

I just wanted to thank you personally.
Stay safe - your up north brother Ed, Canwest Fire Service. “Training Like Their Lives Depend On It!”

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Tony

Tony — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:48:16 +0000

I was pleased to see others were having the same issues as i am. The cigarettes has lost most of the flavor we enjoy and the flare ups are often alarming. As most of you have described we are fully aware of the dangers of smoking but enjoy a good flavorful smoke. This new “device” leaves much to be desired. I too have gone to rolling my own and have stocked up on speed bump free papers. What can we do as a group to have this reversed? What’s next - water speed bumps in our beer so that we don’t get drunk?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Brad

Brad — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:15:27 +0000

I though it was just me, but good to find that I’m not the only one with a scratchy throat and feeling more congested. I am a mild smoker of 5-6 a day, but I’m going to show my displeasure by quitting. RJR and the state of MN can go look somewhere else for revenue. The nanny state I live in succumbed to yet another stupid regulation that made my bad habit worse for me, and taste lousy too. Back to sunflower seeds….

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Bev

Bev — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:06:03 +0000

In the first 37 days of 2009 we already have 13 dead from fire-related causes. That’s twice as many as the same time last year, and one-third the total of 2008. Something tells me the new cigarettes aren’t working!

Comment on The Leader’s Toolbox: “I’m Just a Volunteer” & Lessons Learned in Charleston by volunteering

volunteering — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:06:51 +0000

Volunteering -Peru will find you unpaid work in various social institutions. The only requirement is that you have an adequate level of Spanish for community service. To ensure this, and to help you adapt to this new situation, it is essential that you have followed a Spanish course with us for at least 40 hours (2 weeks)

Comment on The Apparatus Architects: FDSOA Symposium and 2010 Engine News by Michael Jenkowitz

Michael Jenkowitz — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:33:51 +0000

I can’t wait to see the costs of the engines now. We’re trying to buy three pumpers this year to avoid the new nfpa standards.

Comment on Training & Tactics Talk: Examining Text Book Strategy & Tactics by Bill Carey

Bill Carey — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:05:42 +0000

Excellent start for 2009. The tactical objectives and benchmarks is a large area that seems simple but can always be made better. The point of getting the right information to the right people on the firground is critical and complicated. We either have companies arriving and not giving a sizeup, or what you stated is “a doctoral dissertation” on the radio. It reminds me of a phrase I said years ago, “radios; everyone needs one but not everyone should talk on one.” Training on simple fireground communications and how they flow, as well as fully understanding what the IC is listening for (benchmarks) is important.

Comment on Through the Smoke: Parting Words from FEMA Director Dave Paulison - Part 2 by walter Culver

walter Culver — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:38:39 +0000

I would like to say that I too am proud to have had an opportunity to see the success of having a Fire Chief in charge of fema. Dave Paulison put the fire service on the map and proved how capable the fire service is to run such a large government organizationsuccessfully.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Watchdog

Watchdog — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:47:16 +0000

Notice:
The “FSC” initials on “fire safe” cig packs does NOT mean Fire Safe Cigarette.
Nope… It means “Fire Standard Compliant”. The “standard” apparently referring just to the “speed bumps”, period.

And, apparently, no “fire safe” law has banned cig industry use of Burn Accelerants. “Fire Safe” cigs may still have Burn Accelerants!…the citrates, phosphates, calcium carbonate, etc.
No…that’s not on any ingredients label. Nothing is. (Many cigs don’t even claim to contain tobacco! We are to ASSUME that.)

Funny that legislators didn’t notice that confusion is unavoidable here with that “FSC” thing.
People might think that the ‘fire safe’ laws created Fire Safe Cigarettes. Wrong.
A mailing from one cigarette firm put it in writing…that these cigarettes are NOT fire safe.

See…if you still have a fire somehow and sue, cig industry lawyers will just say that THEY never said the cigs were fire safe. If you got that wrong idea from TV or some public officials…tough cookies.

Comment on Through the Smoke: Fire Officer Education from Those Who Know! by landscape architect

landscape architect — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:12:13 +0000

The site is about fire officers education. The good explanation regarding what is their real work? How they caryy out their duties? What are the new trends? How long training and education continue? All the queries were answered in a brief way.
Regards, Bob Richardson
http://4architector.com/

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by millie

millie — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:59:14 +0000

I agree with a lot of what others have already written. When you relight, the end will sometimes flare up. I have had the lit end fall off while smoking. My cigarettes now taste terrible and I almost always have a scratchy throat. I have a few packs left and I will smoke them. But after the last cigarette in the last pack is put out, that will be my last one. I am sure if some self rightous non smoker reads any of these posts, they’ll be thinking how dumb we all sound, but let them start picking up my share of the taxes that won’t be collected on the cigarettes I will not be buying in the future.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Ron Arbelius

Ron Arbelius — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:11:13 +0000

Why not get a law to make only fire safe crack pipes? That might change the minds of the poeple making these decisions and screwing up the smokes!!!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Scott

Scott — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:09:52 +0000

Stupid people start fires with whatever is available to them. You can’t legislate stupidity! This is just another example of a small group of individuals who get off on running other peoples lives for their own satisfaction. We have over 500 fires a year, just in the community where I live. These damn FSC’s have been making me sick. Where is the FDA approval that these things don’t create a larger health hazzard?

Two weeks ago, I ordered the materials to assemble my own cigarettes. I now have a smoke like I used to enjoy before they started adding chemicals. (I’m 55) My choking and gagging went away in three days.
It takes a little time but, it is well worth it. Also, at less than $2.00 a pack they screwed themselves out of the taxes I was paying.

When is the silent majority going to wake up and realize that our govt is in our homes, our cars, our choice of what we should eat, our cigarettes, things that are legal personnal choices.

Hell, if we pass a law to put arsenic in alchohol then we wouldn’t have to worry about returning to prohibition.

Scott Southeastern PA

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Robert Kemp

Robert Kemp — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:26:04 +0000

Fire Safe Cigarettes Aren’t

The cherry falls off and burns whatever it falls on, including your lap, your car seat, your newspaper…

Plus, FSC’s are making people sick all over the nation, google FSC complaint.

This is the Law of Unintended Bad Consequences in action, along with arrogant, tyrannical despots in government which brought us smoking bans in businesses across the country without any choice.

Repeal FSC laws NOW!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Lawrence

Lawrence — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:27:37 +0000

Well, I think that as more and more smokers find the exit and quit smoking philip Morris as well as RJ Reynolds will see the effect as well as feel it. ad without delay spearhead a reversal o this totaly proposrerous farce. What shithead let this pass anyway.
And a warning folks the chemicals in the SC are far more dangerous to your health than a normal cigarette.
Due to this fact i am now an exsmoker that may start again if my smokes are put back the way i like em and left alone, (hear that phillip morris..??). Fix our somkes or feel the pinch. They are gonna require we wear bibbs when we eat too next.Azzholes

Comment on Charleston, SC Sofa Store Fireground Audio by carlo

carlo — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:53:07 +0000

To my brothers and sisters in the CFD god bless you always ,I yes became a LT at my fire dept,I hope to always make the right decision,I thing we all such learn from this tragery and stop pointing finger.and prays that never happen again,god bless all my brothers and sisters at CFD

Comment on Community Fire Protection: Common Voices with Important Safety Messages by Chris@ Fire Protection

Chris@ Fire Protection — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:49:34 +0000

This is fantastic! My father is a fire fighter (I started a fire protection blog for him) and I’m following in his foot steps so I take in keen interest in this kind of thing. Great work.

Comment on Charleston, S.C. Fireground Transmissions: June 18, 2007 by Jason

Jason — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:17:35 +0000

R.I.P. MY BROTHERS ADDISON F.D. WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER YOU

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Keebler

Keebler — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:27:27 +0000

I am a smoker. I live in Oklahoma. I have now been subjected to the supposedly “fire safe cigarettes” and I can assure you these cigarettes are the biggest JOKE that I have ever seen. The flames, sparks, and falling embers happen with greater frequency with EVERY puff you take compared to any previous danger from being left unattended in an ash tray or falling asleep with one in your hand. These things burn holes in everything no matter how careful you are trying to be because the paper they are made of is unpredictable. Especially when you have to repeatedly light the cigarette just to smoke it. Each relight is unpredictable . . . one time the paper at the end will shoot up a flame that burns your hair, or the next time it will explode like fireworks and send sparks flying in all directions, or a fireball will just fall into your lap! Yeah buddy . . . this is going to be REAL SAFE for those of us who are driving down the road now and have to dodge those smokers who are in process of re lighting, get a shower of sparks, and the distraction causes them to cross the center line and hit us head on! I wonder what the death related MVA stats will be a year from now due to these SAFER cigarettes? Fewer deaths in one area, but increased deaths in another? How can that be safer? Not to mention all the health related problems that are cropping up after smoking just one or two packs of these horrible things. FSC’s are NOT safe for anyone!

Ironic isn’t it . . . drunk drivers who have killed people in the past still get to drink the liquor of THEIR CHOICE. I don’t see the government forcing “drunk proof” liquor on anyone. And, the stats for people killed by drunk drivers is far greater than those killed by smoldering cigarettes.

Well, these new FIRE SAFE CIGARETTES will help change those stats soon enough . . . they’ll have a whole new category to pull stats from.

Oh, and in case the thought hasn’t crossed your mind yet . . . I don’t have any stats on the number of people that drink and drive who also SMOKE while they drink and drive. Now, think about this . . . as if driving home drunk isn’t challenge enough, now our state has made it a “law” that these drunk drivers will have to SMOKE these spark flying, fire ball dropping, FIRE SAFE CIGARETTES too, giving them an even greater challenge to make it from point “A” to point “B” without killing someone.

When a loved one of yours is killed by someone who was just trying to keep a FIRE SAFE CIGARETTE from setting his hair on fire or set his car seats on fire and slammed into your vehicle in the process . . . be sure to THANK your STATE government! Yes Sir, by golly our government saved one more person from being killed in a house fire, but didn’t do much to save that little girl in the car did they?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by A Henderson

A Henderson — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:21:40 +0000

Why does this coalition think that adding more of a deadly chemical will save lives? The absurdity of it all suggests two things: one is monetary gain. Who’s benefiting? Obviously not the consumer. And second, are they really that ignorant and oblivious? Coalition news flash if you add more of a deadly chemical you are actually going to increase fatalities. Not to mention having to relight the cig so many times thats more times the hands are off the steering wheel, more embers falling all over the place, etc. Common sense demands it be known that this is the worst idea I’ve ever heard of in legislation… no wonder it was snuck through by lobbyists. God I hate lobbyists…

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by K Hayden

K Hayden — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:00:00 +0000

I have noticed that the FSC “paper” makes the cigarettes taste more nastier than usual. I also heard that the tobacco compaines have added an extra “ingredient” to make the cigarettes more safer. That’s bull! My husband and brother-in-law wants to quits smoking because they have been feeling more congested that normal. I still don’t understand what’s so “great” about FSC! Someone please explain it to me!!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Rainy

Rainy — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:56:01 +0000

Fighting for Safety
Your Couch Is Caught in a Flammable Regulatory Battle Between the Chemical and Furniture Industries

By Annys Shin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 26, 2008; D01

Since its inception, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has grappled with how to reduce the number of deaths and injuries from accidental fires. It chose to tackle the problem by crafting a regulation to make upholstered furniture less flammable. A record 14 years later, a rule is heaving into sight, with a final vote possible later this year.

If the regulation is approved, it will end a protracted battle among a far-flung set of interests. The story behind the rule and why it took so long offers a glimpse at the constraints under which the CPSC operates. Hemmed in by jurisdictional dictates and sometimes hampered by a lack of clear scientific evidence, the commission became caught in the middle of warring industries. It became increasingly preoccupied with finding a compromise, and, at times, not able or inclined to impose its will on the voices shouting to be heard.

Those voices included fire marshals recruited to fight fire-safe cigarettes, a Berkeley biochemist who suspected her couch poisoned her cat, a group of Mississippi furniture makers, and an energetic ex-tobacco lobbyist who relished hardball tactics.

READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/25/AR2008012503170_pf.html

SIGN THE PETITION HERE to Repeal FSC:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-fire-safe-cigarette-laws

A. The Harvard School of Health reported that when comparing NY Cigarettes (FSC) versus Regular Cigarettes, the FSC cigarettes produced 13.9% more Naphthalene and 11.4% more carbon monoxide than regular cigarettes.[1] Naphthalene is commonly found in moth balls, and exposure in high amounts can result in %u201CSymptoms of acute exposure include headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, confusion, anemia, jaundice, convulsions, and coma.%u201D

b. Phillip Morris USA has reported that the Adhesive ethylene vinyl acetate and polyvinyl acetate are used in the non-tobacco ingredients of cigarettes produced as a Side-seam adhesive. However, Phillip Morris USA fails to distinguish the differences in levels between regular and FSC cigarettes. The amount does not exceed .6 % combined.[3] Since additional layers of paper are used in FSC cigarettes, more adhesive is needed in the form of ethylene vinyl acetate.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by God

God — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:43:08 +0000

these cigarettes have almost started more fires for me than ever. every time i have to re-light them, more embers fall from the cigarette and get everywhere. thanks for screwing another one up for the team.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Mark Ingersoll

Mark Ingersoll — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:29:37 +0000

As the others here, I have had several weeks now of respiratory and sinus problems. Last nite, I Googled “cigarette won’t stay lit burning lips” - and well, here I am with FSC.

A bit of research shows James Shannon to be a lawyer and was a politician for a while. I’m not sure he is the primary motivator - probably just a figurehead for the NFPA org.

There has to be a money trail somewhere. And, there has to be some level of strategy in quietly pushing this through to the states. The Feds wouldn’t take up the issue. And, again, somebody somewhere is making money on this.

I am fine with dumping the cigarettes. But, the high level strategy for predicting the reactions is indicative of manipulating a product for financial gain. Don’t think for one second that FSC has not been well planned and executed unless there was substantial profit!

Lastly, any day you think that your health or vote or life is more important as compared to the potential of making large sums of money - is the day you should have “stupid” or “ignorant” tattooed to your forehead.

This IS about MONEY.

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Bev

Bev — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 02:16:35 +0000

We have people with bleeding throats, sore throats, new cases of asthma, and all because the government needs to step in AGAIN! It’s funny but the other day I put a cigarette down in the ashtray when I went to answer the phone. When I came back, it was still burning, all the way down to the filter. Yes, I checked. It was an FSC cigarette. So much for the safety. It will go out while I’m holding it, but not when I lay it down? How is that safer? My husband still burns his shirts, but has to light a cigarette three or four times while he’s driving, and no, he isn’t good at multi-tasking!!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Pete

Pete — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:13:07 +0000

Wow, not one intelligent response so far. Oh well.

Comment on FDNY Rescue Company, USAR and Beyond - A Chat With FDNY’s Battalion Chief Fred P. LaFemina by luke

luke — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:21:00 +0000

hi i was wondering how can i become a firefighter in the fdny if im an australian is there any hope this has been a childhood dream someone please write back my email is lukeburns@y7mail.com

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by No name just like you fucker's

No name just like you fucker's — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:38:50 +0000

The NFPA sounds to me like a bunch of college educated idiot’s, why don’t you dumb ass’s try some real work instead of dressing up in your suit’s and tie’s and sitting around and running your mouth’s!! All you fucker’s must be non-smokers, but I bet most of you drink!! I want drunk safe beer then!! Let’s have it!! You will not get away with this bullshit!! I’ll bet on it!! Can’t wait to hear about the lawsuit!!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Kate

Kate — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 19:03:19 +0000

I too became ill and did not know what was causing my illness. Before I finished the second pack I had figured it out. I have not smoked another since I figured out what was going on. They are THAT toxic, I am a chronic smoker–but I will not smoke them. I Called Phillip Morris and complained, sent their toxic cigarettes back to them and am still waiting for my “reimbursement” check. I encourage everyone to complain to them too, along with local, state, and federal government. They won’t listen, but we need the documentation. There must be one honest lawyer in this country who would lead a class action lawsuit, right?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Angry Smoker

Angry Smoker — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:16:07 +0000

Morons - cigarettes are supposed to burn. May you burn in hell.

Comment on Campus Firewatch Radio: Increasing Personal Safety Awareness Among Students by thisshouldbeillegal.com discussed with Radio@Firehouse.com « thisshouldbeillegal.com

Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:38:16 +0000

[…] Listen to podcast here. […]

Comment on Campus Firewatch Radio: Increasing Personal Safety Awareness Among Students by Mariya

Mariya — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:13:54 +0000

Hi Friends,

What best of all, Dollar or Euro? This question worry many peoples.
But only you make your choice! Remember - your love and your personal intelligence make you rich.

–
Maria
http://www.girlsupdates.com
http://www.mysex-blog.com

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Jenn C Austin, Tx

Jenn C Austin, Tx — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:10:00 +0000

I think this law is a good thing, safety wise…I just feel like as smokers, we should’ve been given some kind of heads up. Smoking is already bad enough for our health and we know this, and still we choose to smoke. My only complaint is the extra chemicals in our cigarettes, that are more hazardous and toxic that we were and still are unaware about. Theres gotta be a healthier way to make fire safe cigarettes and by healthier, I mean less fatal!?

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Bev

Bev — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:46:56 +0000

I too became ill after smoking the fsc, so I did some research. Here is what I have found. There is a higher level of chemicals in the fire safe cigarettes and these chemicals have been proven to be more toxic than regular cigs and cause increased health related problems for smokers! They have 13.9% more Naphthalene and 14% more carbon monoxide than regular cigs. Naphthalene is commonly found in mothballs and acute exposure can cause headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, confusion, anemia, jaundice, convultions, and coma!!! How can this be legal?? Someone is going to get seriously ill from this and then have a major lawsuit against everyone involved in sneaking this law in on us! At this point I can still cross the border into North Dakota (100 miles) to get non fsc cigs but that won’t be for much longer! Something has to be done about this. Drunk drivers kill more people every day in this country than cigarette related fires do! Why not an alcohol that has a chemical in it to reduce drunkedness?? All smokers really need to band together to reverse this stupid law! Non smokers screamed loud enough to get a law against smoking in bars now we need to scream louder against this law that is endangering our health and perhaps our lives!

Comment on The NFPA’s Fire-Safe Cigarette Campaign by Jay

Jay — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:29:42 +0000

When FSCs become nationwide, the closest thing to a “real” cigarette will be smoking Native American cigarettes. Unlike the popular brands that have dangerous chemicals in the cigarettes, including the “FSC ingredients,” Native cigarettes don’t go out on their own while you’re smoking it. And they have real tobacco in them. If you examined the inside of a Marlboro, even a “normal” Marlboro, you’ll see there’s no tobacco in it.

I agree the FSCs are a way to get smokers to quit smoking. But quitting smoking shouldn’t be an option if you really like smoking. You should switch to Native American brands instead. Brands that have nothing but tobacco in them. No chemicals and no peservatives in these cigs. And best of all, they’re not fire safe cigs either.

Oh yeah, a carton of every Native cigarette brand is only 14-16 bucks each.

You can learn more about the different Native brands at this site.

http://blackhawktobaccoshop.com/

Comment on Training & Tactics Talk: Training Philosophies by Bookmarks about Broadcast

Bookmarks about Broadcast — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:45:20 +0000

[…] - bookmarked by 6 members originally found by monkmonk666 on 2008-11-17 Training & Tactics Talk: Training Philosophies http://dynamic.firehouse.com/broadcast/2008/07/09/training-tactics-talk-training-philosophies/ - […]